lcp
We have detected you are using Internet Explorer. To provide the best and most secure experience, please use a modern browser as we do not support Internet Explorer.

Boundaries

08 April 2021 - Dr Jan Orman

If your peer group is like mine, the value of boundaries and what does or does not constitute a violation of them is a frequent topic of conversation.

What constitutes a boundary violation?

Most of us (though unfortunately not all) choose not to have an intimate relationship with the people we see professionally. But would you accept an invitation to a patient’s wedding? Would you go for coffee with a client if you ran into them in the street or have a drink with them if you encountered them in a bar? Would you go to the opening of their art exhibition, attend their creative writing workshop or use their plumbing services?  It gets complicated doesn’t it?

For most of us the answer to ALL the above questions is a pretty firm and absolute NO. However, sometimes circumstances make it very difficult to maintain strong boundaries.

What if your patient Jim is the only plumber in town? You have known Angela professionally for 20 years and spent a long time in your consultations with her encouraging her artistic ambitions. What if she wants you to see the works she has produced with your encouragement? What if you are a single woman working as a GP in a small rural town and the only men you meet are the ones who come to see you as a patient?

Surely the same rules don’t apply to GPs!

There is a difference between being a GP and being a therapist when it comes to boundaries – but not much of a one. GPs often have enough knowledge of their patient’s life circumstances and emotional states to complicate any kind of social or emotional involvement outside of work, to interfere with objectivity and to create a power imbalance.

Decisions about where boundaries lie depends on many variables including the nature of the professional interaction, the practitioner’s level of training and skill and the mental health needs of the patient/client.

What about phone calls, text messaging and email?

 Most people would (and do) recoil at the idea of giving patients/clients their mobile phone number. That’s a perfectly reasonable boundary to set. However, practitioners trained to deliver dialectical behaviour therapy provide their mobile phone number as a matter of course so their patients/clients can ring for support when they need it. It’s part of the therapy model but it is bounded by its own set of rules including the fact that the practitioner’s role in those circumstances is only to remind their patient/client to use the coping skills they have learnt in face-to-face therapy sessions. The boundaries are there – they are just sitting in a different place.

Generally, someone declaring their romantic interest in a doctor or therapist would be reason to end the professional relationship. In a recent case in Victoria that is not what happened. A psychiatrist with a respected history of managing treatment resistant conditions chose to continue treating a patient who had revealed erotic feelings towards him. A subsequent complaint against him by the patient to the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal for violating boundaries in caring for her based on his use of text and email messaging was not upheld.

The Tribunal found that the practitioner had been very clear in articulating where the boundaries lay, that he had faultlessly documented all communication with the patient (they do actually look at all your phone and email records when investigating a complaint like this) and that the clinical purpose of these communications had been satisfactorily explained.

The other side of the coin

There is also the boundary that prevents us from seeing our good friends and family members as patients or clients to consider. Apart from the risks inherent in keeping secrets to protect the friendship there’s a real danger of objectivity flying out the window. It’s not always possible, especially for GPs, to avoid this situation, but the general rule is the closer you are personally to someone the more important it is not to be their therapist.

References:

Dr Jan Orman
Dr Jan Orman

Jan is Sydney GP, private psychological medicine practitioner in Sydney’s inner west and a GP educator for Black Dog Institute.

Read more
Get Medcast Plus

Become a member and get unlimited access to 100s of hours of premium education.

Learn more
Related News
Critical care nutrition: enteral vs parenteral recommendations for the ICU patient

Susan Helmrich

Nutrition plays a vital role in the recovery of critically ill patients. Evidence-based recommendations for patients in the ICU focus on the timing, energy requirement and protein targets as well as the role of micronutrients. The route of administration is not always straightforward and best guided by the patient's clinical needs, indications and contraindications.

5 mins READ
Atrial fibrillation diagnosis and assessment - clinical fact sheet & MCQ

Medcast Medical Education Team

Brand icon

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common and significantly impacts mortality, contributing to as many as 1 in 10 deaths in Australia. This FastTrack is the first of two, focusing on the diagnosis and management of AF, from the recommendations on opportunistic screening to identifying comorbidities and precipitating factors. Complete the quiz to earn 30mins EA and 30mins RP CPD.

15 mins READ
Supporting veterans’ mental health

Dr Catherine Eltringham

Brand icon

As veterans transition from military service, they often face significant mental health challenges, including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, anxiety, and adjustment difficulties. Managing these complex conditions requires a holistic, long-term approach, and general practitioners (GPs) are in a unique position to support veterans not only through referrals to mental health specialists but also through evidence-based lifestyle interventions that promote resilience and recovery.

30 mins READ