Your patient, Anna, has just arrived in the intensive care unit from the operating room where she had an anaphylactic arrest at the completion of her total hip replacement surgery. There will be a range of actions that need to be prioritised to ensure a safe transition of care, optimisation of recovery, and minimisation of risk of deterioration or re-arrest. What are your priorities?
Prior to patient arrival, ensure the ICU environment is optimally prepared for rapid response:
Check emergency equipment: Check bedside and emergency equipment is ready for use. This should include suction, oxygen, and resuscitation trolley. Specialist equipment like ventilators should also be checked and put into standby mode prior to the patient arriving.
Set up monitoring parameters: Adjust alarms on monitors based on the patient’s expected condition. Plan for a likely insertion of central line, arterial line, and IDC. If you have been updated on the patient’s haemodynamic status, you may be able to start preparing any required infusions such as noradrenaline.
The first few minutes with an unstable ICU patient are crucial.
Obtain handover via a clinical handover tool like ISBAR. Check any devices including IV access, drains, IDC, or nasogastric tube.
Attach monitoring and verify alarm parameters are appropriate.
Perform a primary survey using an ABCDE (airway, breathing, circulation, disability, exposure) approach.
Document assessment findings and baseline observations.
While stabilising the patient, work with the multidisciplinary team members to prioritise care including insertion of lines, and devices, performing x-rays and bloods, and obtaining an ABG and 12 lead ECG. Prioritise based on patient requirements and stability:
Fluid resuscitation and vasopressors: In cases of haemodynamic instability, prompt administration of IV fluids and titration of vasopressors, like noradrenaline, can improve tissue perfusion.
Central venous line insertion: For patients who require continuous vasopressors and inotropes, a central line should be prioritised to ensure effective administration and allow for haemodynamic monitoring.
Ventilation support: For patients with respiratory failure, start high-flow nasal prong oxygen (HFNP) or non-invasive ventilation (NIV), or mechanical ventilation. The decision between the two depends on the severity of hypoxaemia and dyspnoea.
Continual monitoring is necessary to track the response to interventions and detect deterioration early:
Haemodynamic stability: Reassess blood pressure, heart rate, and perfusion frequently, adjusting vasopressor support as needed.
Ventilation and oxygenation: Monitor oxygen saturation and adjust oxygen delivery to maintain target SpO₂ levels, particularly if the patient is on NIV or mechanical ventilation.
Neurological status: Regular assessment of neurological function, including responsiveness and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, is vital to detect any signs of deterioration.
A commitment to patient safety is essential, particularly when managing unstable patients. The Australian College of Critical Care Nurses (ACCCN) recommends cultivating a culture where asking for assistance and utilising clinical support resources is encouraged. Reaching out to ICU team leaders or senior clinicians can provide additional perspectives and help guide complex decisions.
Susan is the Head of Nursing Education for the Medcast Group.
DipAppScNsg, BN, CritCareCert, CoronaryCareCert, TraumaNsgCareCert, CertIV(TAE), MN(Ed), and GradCert(Ldrshp & Mgt).
Become a member and get unlimited access to 100s of hours of premium education.
Learn moreWayne is a 68-year-old post-CABG patient with third-degree heart block on temporary epicardial pacing who suddenly experiences a bradycardia and hypotension.
67-year-old Ling, recently relocated from China, was admitted to the stroke unit post-thrombolysis for an ischaemic stroke. When should early stroke rehabilitation begin and what should this entail?
Antiseptic Non-Touch Technique (ANTT®) plays a critical role in managing Central Venous Access Devices (CVADs) to prevent infections. While both standard and surgical ANTT approaches aim to maintain asepsis during procedures, they differ significantly in their application and outcomes. Understanding these distinctions ensures healthcare providers optimise infection control and patient safety in wound care and CVAD management.