As conscientious medical educators, we are always on the look-out for ways to further assist our registrars with their educational needs. Both those that struggle and those that do well endure our insistence on formulating individual learning plans. Compliance with creating plans that seem to provide a meaningful and worthwhile contribution to the registrars’ learning seems to be a battle much of the time, even with the motivated. And, with those that struggle, a battle on a larger scale. In search of ways to make individual learning meaningful there has been a focus on individual learning styles.
Evaluating the styles and helping educators and/or learners to tailor their input to meet these various styles has become a topic of much discussion and has generated much commercial interest. A quick google search of “learning styles” in 2015 will rapidly yield you 25, 100, 000 entries on the topic in 0.32 seconds, an overwhelming amount of information by any measure. As I have tried to plough through the chaff looking for some wheat in this area recently I was beginning to wonder about the utility and validity of a field of interest that proposes the need for identifying individual variation and then proceeds to systematically place people into stylistic boxes? And, apart from the interest of knowing that you have a preference for kinaesthetic learning, how does that actually assist you to learn?
The dance of the dermatomes might have been helpful in medical school but applying similar methods to the complex GP curriculum might be a little challenging. But I digress! In my search I did come across this interesting article co-written by the educator who wrote one of the original papers on the subject area which has come to be known as and perhaps oversimplified as “learning styles”. I was interested to read his critique of the direction that his research has been taken. I wonder how his reflections should inform our practice as medical educators? And, if not learning style analysis, then what other methods can we use to assist our registrars find effective ways to foster their individual learning? Does anyone use learning style assessments? What do you think of their efficacy? Is there any good quality research on whether knowing this affects learning outcomes? Interested in everyone’s thoughts.
Stephen is a GP Supervisor, Medical Educator, GP academic and Medical Director of Medcast. He has completed a PhD on Virtual Communities of Practice in GP Training.
Become a member and get unlimited access to 100s of hours of premium education.
Learn moreThis article explores the risks and management of dynamic hyperinflation in mechanically ventilated patients with status asthmaticus. It outlines causes such as airway obstruction and bronchospasm, and provides strategies for adjusting ventilation settings to minimise gas trapping, support cardiac function, and reduce complications like pneumothorax and systemic hypotension.
This is the second FastTrack on atrial fibrillation (AF). Part 1 described the diagnosis, initial assessment of AF, and indications for urgent review. This FastTrack describes the approach to setting a management strategy using risk calculators, how to assess and reduce risk factors, and long term monitoring of patients with AF.
While cardiac arrest is often a rare event, the high stakes nature means we need to be able to respond instinctively, ensuring immediate effective action when it matters most. How do you stay prepared in-between ALS or PALS courses?