We have detected you are using Internet Explorer. To provide the best and most secure experience, please use a modern browser as we do not support Internet Explorer.

Are learning styles a myth?

24 February 2016 - A/Prof Stephen Barnett

As conscientious medical educators, we are always on the look-out for ways to further assist our registrars with their educational needs. Both those that struggle and those that do well endure our insistence on formulating individual learning plans. Compliance with creating plans that seem to provide a meaningful and worthwhile contribution to the registrars’ learning seems to be a battle much of the time, even with the motivated. And, with those that struggle, a battle on a larger scale. In search of ways to make individual learning meaningful there has been a focus on individual learning styles.

Evaluating the styles and helping educators and/or learners to tailor their input to meet these various styles has become a topic of much discussion and has generated much commercial interest. A quick google search of “learning styles” in 2015 will rapidly yield you 25, 100, 000 entries on the topic in 0.32 seconds, an overwhelming amount of information by any measure. As I have tried to plough through the chaff looking for some wheat in this area recently I was beginning to wonder about the utility and validity of a field of interest that proposes the need for identifying individual variation and then proceeds to systematically place people into stylistic boxes? And, apart from the interest of knowing that you have a preference for kinaesthetic learning, how does that actually assist you to learn?

The dance of the dermatomes might have been helpful in medical school but applying similar methods to the complex GP curriculum might be a little challenging. But I digress! In my search I did come across this interesting article co-written by the educator who wrote one of the original papers on the subject area which has come to be known as and perhaps oversimplified as “learning styles”. I was interested to read his critique of the direction that his research has been taken. I wonder how his reflections should inform our practice as medical educators? And, if not learning style analysis, then what other methods can we use to assist our registrars find effective ways to foster their individual learning? Does anyone use learning style assessments? What do you think of their efficacy? Is there any good quality research on whether knowing this affects learning outcomes? Interested in everyone’s thoughts.

A/Prof Stephen Barnett
A/Prof Stephen Barnett

Stephen is a GP Supervisor, Medical Educator, GP academic and Medical Director of Medcast. He has completed a PhD on Virtual Communities of Practice in GP Training.

Get Medcast Plus

Become a member and get unlimited access to 100s of hours of premium education.

Learn more
Latest News
Tools for your practice: VETERAN lens autofill template
Brand icon

This useful tool shows the aspects of the Veteran Health Check to incorporate into all relevant consultations with Veterans at any time after transition, including a useful autofill template.

5 mins READ
Keep the Fire Burning: bridging gaps and building trust

Australia's healthcare system, often lauded for its comprehensive and accessible nature, has a glaring gap when it comes to addressing the unique needs of First Nations people.

5 mins READ
New resources to optimise veteran healthcare
Brand icon

Launching tomorrow, the Department of Veterans’ Affairs has partnered with medical education company Medcast, to provide freely available resources for health professionals to assess and manage veterans’ health.

5 mins READ